<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for No-one Expects the Secret Police</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.davenelson.info/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.davenelson.info</link>
	<description>The personal weblog of DS Nelson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skepticism by Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=408&#038;cpage=1#comment-12017</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=408#comment-12017</guid>
		<description>Evolution is merely a process where on the most local of scales a gene mutates but has no effect, through to a mutation that does have an effect to a mutation effect that affects, either positively or negatively the survival of that individual against competing beings and so on. The classifications are merely there to guide us and there are numerous different encyclopedias of life each putting the same samples in a different genus or species. Now we know Neanderthals can inter-breed with homosapiens (or could at the time) we will likely see Neanderthals reclassified as a sub-species of Homospapiens rather than redefine the meaning of  the word &quot;species&quot;, that&#039;s scientific progress and bares no influence over the validity of evolutionary theory itself which has been proven through experiment on bacteria who experience &quot;significant&quot; gene mutations on time scales observable by humans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolution is merely a process where on the most local of scales a gene mutates but has no effect, through to a mutation that does have an effect to a mutation effect that affects, either positively or negatively the survival of that individual against competing beings and so on. The classifications are merely there to guide us and there are numerous different encyclopedias of life each putting the same samples in a different genus or species. Now we know Neanderthals can inter-breed with homosapiens (or could at the time) we will likely see Neanderthals reclassified as a sub-species of Homospapiens rather than redefine the meaning of  the word &#8220;species&#8221;, that&#8217;s scientific progress and bares no influence over the validity of evolutionary theory itself which has been proven through experiment on bacteria who experience &#8220;significant&#8221; gene mutations on time scales observable by humans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skepticism by klem</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=408&#038;cpage=1#comment-12016</link>
		<dc:creator>klem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 12:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=408#comment-12016</guid>
		<description>I too subscribe to the questioning skeptic viewpoint, and I too believe that evolution is the way organisms evolve over time. However I have some nagging concerns about the completeness of the theory of evolution, the origin of species, I have an idea that there is more to it and that even though we have a mountain of corroborating evidence I still think there is something missing. 

When one looks up the definition of species there seems to be some disagreement among biologist as to what defines a species (go ahead look it up on Wikipedia). Some biologists define a species as one which cannot mate with another species and produce a viable offspring. Others use a different definition. If biologists cannot agree on the definition of species, how can they determine if a species has evolved into another species or not? For example, recently we hear a lot about the Neanderthal species of humans which went extinct 30k years ago, but that they’re still part of our genetic make up today. But if they were a separate species, as claimed, then we should not have been able to mate with them successfully. In other words, they were not a separate species in the first place. At least by the most commonly used definition of species. And also, we breed dogs into any shape size color we want, but we have never bread a dog into a new species, why? (Now I’m talking about normal breeding, not genetic modification) We breed mice and fruit files in the lab into anything we want but we have never been able to breed them into a new species, why not? Perhaps we have been creating new species if you use some new definition. This is where the evolution theory remains a bit questionable, in my eyes. I don’t think it is complete, there is something missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too subscribe to the questioning skeptic viewpoint, and I too believe that evolution is the way organisms evolve over time. However I have some nagging concerns about the completeness of the theory of evolution, the origin of species, I have an idea that there is more to it and that even though we have a mountain of corroborating evidence I still think there is something missing. </p>
<p>When one looks up the definition of species there seems to be some disagreement among biologist as to what defines a species (go ahead look it up on Wikipedia). Some biologists define a species as one which cannot mate with another species and produce a viable offspring. Others use a different definition. If biologists cannot agree on the definition of species, how can they determine if a species has evolved into another species or not? For example, recently we hear a lot about the Neanderthal species of humans which went extinct 30k years ago, but that they’re still part of our genetic make up today. But if they were a separate species, as claimed, then we should not have been able to mate with them successfully. In other words, they were not a separate species in the first place. At least by the most commonly used definition of species. And also, we breed dogs into any shape size color we want, but we have never bread a dog into a new species, why? (Now I’m talking about normal breeding, not genetic modification) We breed mice and fruit files in the lab into anything we want but we have never been able to breed them into a new species, why not? Perhaps we have been creating new species if you use some new definition. This is where the evolution theory remains a bit questionable, in my eyes. I don’t think it is complete, there is something missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon EOS 650 by Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=340&#038;cpage=1#comment-11909</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dnel.co.uk/?p=340#comment-11909</guid>
		<description>My first roll worked out very nicely although my film wasn&#039;t much cop, contrast was too high and some leakage on the early shots but the camera performed admirably. I don&#039;t plan any high mountain treks but I&#039;ll keep it in mind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first roll worked out very nicely although my film wasn&#8217;t much cop, contrast was too high and some leakage on the early shots but the camera performed admirably. I don&#8217;t plan any high mountain treks but I&#8217;ll keep it in mind <img src='http://blog.davenelson.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon EOS 650 by Stewart</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=340&#038;cpage=1#comment-11908</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 11:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dnel.co.uk/?p=340#comment-11908</guid>
		<description>I agree that the EOS650 is a great camera. I have taken loads of portraits and landscape shots which all worked out well despite my habit of grabbing a sudden opportunity. Sadly mine nearly froze in the himalaya and despite repairs from my local shop only works intermittently. 

So stay warm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the EOS650 is a great camera. I have taken loads of portraits and landscape shots which all worked out well despite my habit of grabbing a sudden opportunity. Sadly mine nearly froze in the himalaya and despite repairs from my local shop only works intermittently. </p>
<p>So stay warm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BT &#8211; The world&#8217;s worst customer service? by caz</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=259&#038;cpage=1#comment-11539</link>
		<dc:creator>caz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secretpolice.co.uk/?p=298#comment-11539</guid>
		<description>After speaking to an ex-BT employee, it&#039;s become v.clear that they do not provide their staff with simple authorisational tools. For example, the reason they can&#039;t reconnect lines is because whilst your line is down, they then allocate it to SOMEONE ELSE! Which I fully agree is frustrating, even more so as a business. This is a major concern. Another, none of their general call center staff have access to simple billing, therefore a simple name change cannot be done, without the system demanding they cut off the customer, thus losing your number in the process!

I cannot believe that BT, one of the world&#039;s biggest businesses can&#039;t grasp the concept of addressing these most pressing issues and kill a bird with two stones, because they&#039;d then be providing SOME sort of GOOD customer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After speaking to an ex-BT employee, it&#8217;s become v.clear that they do not provide their staff with simple authorisational tools. For example, the reason they can&#8217;t reconnect lines is because whilst your line is down, they then allocate it to SOMEONE ELSE! Which I fully agree is frustrating, even more so as a business. This is a major concern. Another, none of their general call center staff have access to simple billing, therefore a simple name change cannot be done, without the system demanding they cut off the customer, thus losing your number in the process!</p>
<p>I cannot believe that BT, one of the world&#8217;s biggest businesses can&#8217;t grasp the concept of addressing these most pressing issues and kill a bird with two stones, because they&#8217;d then be providing SOME sort of GOOD customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BT &#8211; The world&#8217;s worst customer service? by Pamela Marshall</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=259&#038;cpage=1#comment-11537</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secretpolice.co.uk/?p=298#comment-11537</guid>
		<description>Im about to jump ship from BT and move to Be for my internet use,the phone line is still in my old flatmates name and judging from my predecessors comments im in for a crap ride with BT to transfer the details over!!!!! if an article appears in the local newspaper of an irrate wegie storming the BT callcentre that&#039;ll be me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im about to jump ship from BT and move to Be for my internet use,the phone line is still in my old flatmates name and judging from my predecessors comments im in for a crap ride with BT to transfer the details over!!!!! if an article appears in the local newspaper of an irrate wegie storming the BT callcentre that&#8217;ll be me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BT &#8211; The world&#8217;s worst customer service? by Anne Plumridge</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=259&#038;cpage=1#comment-11536</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Plumridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secretpolice.co.uk/?p=298#comment-11536</guid>
		<description>First the B in BT should be changed to IT, as it is a disgrace to have B meaning British.

We have holiday Lodges, one of which we have been living in with phone and Broadband connected for our business, we had a new Lodge built on site just a few yards from the others so when it was completed we phoned BT to get the phone and broadband transferred, simple enough you would think!!!

It was arranged that BT would come on Monday 9th June to connect to the new Lodge then Open Reach on the Tuesday to put in the phone and broadband.

No one turned up on the Monday but they still disconnected the phone and broadband. Nor did any one bother to let us know that they couldn’t make it.

On the Tuesday Open Reach arrived to connect inside the house, but of course he couldn&#039;t as no one had been to connect it to the outside of the house.
He said it would be a few days before anything could be done.
When we asked if he could reconnect the phone again he said that our number had been cancelled and given to someone else and broadband had also been cancelled.

 So we were left trying to run a business with no phone and no Internet.

My husband and I had to use our mobiles at great expense to try and get some one in India to try to explain to us what was going on, we both got very frustrated and so did they hanging up on us twice which is unacceptable and disgraceful.
Eventually the phone was connected in the new lodge but still no broadband.

After a few days we managed to get to speak to some one in India that we could actually understand and could understand us, he sorted out a dial up connection for us.
He also said that we needed a new contract for Broadband even though our contract hadn&#039;t run out. It took three weeks to get everything sorted out and not once did BT apologise.
We lost customer bookings, had expensive calls on our mobiles and all because of BT&#039;s incompetence.

It is absolutely disgusting the way they treat you, even a simple phone call gets you passed from one office to another forever listening to music, and then getting cut off when you have been hanging on for 20 minutes.

I only hope that I never have to deal with BT again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the B in BT should be changed to IT, as it is a disgrace to have B meaning British.</p>
<p>We have holiday Lodges, one of which we have been living in with phone and Broadband connected for our business, we had a new Lodge built on site just a few yards from the others so when it was completed we phoned BT to get the phone and broadband transferred, simple enough you would think!!!</p>
<p>It was arranged that BT would come on Monday 9th June to connect to the new Lodge then Open Reach on the Tuesday to put in the phone and broadband.</p>
<p>No one turned up on the Monday but they still disconnected the phone and broadband. Nor did any one bother to let us know that they couldn’t make it.</p>
<p>On the Tuesday Open Reach arrived to connect inside the house, but of course he couldn&#8217;t as no one had been to connect it to the outside of the house.<br />
He said it would be a few days before anything could be done.<br />
When we asked if he could reconnect the phone again he said that our number had been cancelled and given to someone else and broadband had also been cancelled.</p>
<p> So we were left trying to run a business with no phone and no Internet.</p>
<p>My husband and I had to use our mobiles at great expense to try and get some one in India to try to explain to us what was going on, we both got very frustrated and so did they hanging up on us twice which is unacceptable and disgraceful.<br />
Eventually the phone was connected in the new lodge but still no broadband.</p>
<p>After a few days we managed to get to speak to some one in India that we could actually understand and could understand us, he sorted out a dial up connection for us.<br />
He also said that we needed a new contract for Broadband even though our contract hadn&#8217;t run out. It took three weeks to get everything sorted out and not once did BT apologise.<br />
We lost customer bookings, had expensive calls on our mobiles and all because of BT&#8217;s incompetence.</p>
<p>It is absolutely disgusting the way they treat you, even a simple phone call gets you passed from one office to another forever listening to music, and then getting cut off when you have been hanging on for 20 minutes.</p>
<p>I only hope that I never have to deal with BT again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Ramsey&#8230; by David</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=286&#038;cpage=1#comment-11786</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnel.co.uk/blog/?p=339#comment-11786</guid>
		<description>Yuki appears to be quite content that there&#039;s another cat in the house, he seems to have assumed that Ramsey is the new top cat, probably because he doesn&#039;t look unlike Gonzo. He&#039;s curious but cautious and keeps trying to get close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuki appears to be quite content that there&#8217;s another cat in the house, he seems to have assumed that Ramsey is the new top cat, probably because he doesn&#8217;t look unlike Gonzo. He&#8217;s curious but cautious and keeps trying to get close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Ramsey&#8230; by Phil Long</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=286&#038;cpage=1#comment-11785</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnel.co.uk/blog/?p=339#comment-11785</guid>
		<description>Yay - equilibrium is restored. ;)  Just as Yuki was upset when Gonzo died, is he similarly upset he&#039;s no longer the centre of attention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay &#8211; equilibrium is restored. <img src='http://blog.davenelson.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Just as Yuki was upset when Gonzo died, is he similarly upset he&#8217;s no longer the centre of attention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BT &#8211; The world&#8217;s worst customer service? by Elias</title>
		<link>http://blog.davenelson.info/?p=259&#038;cpage=1#comment-11526</link>
		<dc:creator>Elias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.secretpolice.co.uk/?p=298#comment-11526</guid>
		<description>Having moved to a new I was astounded to find out I was going to be charged £165 for the transfer of my name and details to the new address, furthermore they didn&#039;t even let me keep my old number. I reluctantly paid the sum but the following month the same amount was taken from my account (£165). I called BT or should I say India, they were not helpful at all, they diddn&#039;t even have my details in their system, they couldn&#039;t explain why the money was taken from my account. I now use those payment cards things to pay my bill. DON&#039;T EVER GIVE BT ACCESS TO YOUR ACCOUNT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having moved to a new I was astounded to find out I was going to be charged £165 for the transfer of my name and details to the new address, furthermore they didn&#8217;t even let me keep my old number. I reluctantly paid the sum but the following month the same amount was taken from my account (£165). I called BT or should I say India, they were not helpful at all, they diddn&#8217;t even have my details in their system, they couldn&#8217;t explain why the money was taken from my account. I now use those payment cards things to pay my bill. DON&#8217;T EVER GIVE BT ACCESS TO YOUR ACCOUNT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
